Interval funds have had explosive growth as private credit鈥檚 enticing yields draw individual investors to the asset class, a constituency that alternative lenders are increasingly targeting.
Putting direct lending investments in an interval fund structure leads to an inherent tension though: Interval funds require liquidity, but private credit is illiquid. That dichotomy highlights the importance of managing the cash needs of these funds, particularly as to how they might endure a possible surge in redemption requests.
鈥淪ome fund managers are not necessarily thinking about providing that quarterly liquidity, and they certainly may not be thinking about providing that over the long-term,鈥 said Jason Mandinach, who leads聽product strategy for PIMCO鈥檚 global alternative credit and private strategies platform.
A record 50 new interval funds launched in 2024, with 55 such vehicles expected to launch in the next six months, according to XA Investments, an alternative management firm that offers closed-end fund structuring and consulting services.
Interval funds are semi-liquid vehicles that work if managers can meet their liquidity needs, which is between a 5% and 25% redemption on a quarterly basis. Since these funds are offered perpetually, cash that managers receive from investors buying into these pools of capital can be used to offset redemptions.
There鈥檚 no industry standard for overseeing these funds, and managers have yet to contend with back-to-back quarters of net outflows, as some experienced during the Great Financial Crisis.
鈥淎 lot of interval funds do not have a devoted liability management team or full-time focus, said Daniel Lepore, head of liability management at Cliffwater. 鈥淭hat may put their investors at risk of not necessarily receiving the promised liquidity that interval funds should support at all times and across all market conditions.鈥
Lepore manages the liability strategy, which includes the financing of redemptions, for the firm鈥檚 funds, including Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund, the industry鈥檚 largest interval fund with over $29bn in total net assets.
The liquidity risks for these funds are amplified given their rising popularity among high-net-worth retail investors, according to a report by Moody鈥檚, which notes investors might not fully grasp the lockups that come with investing in illiquid instruments.
Investors need to consider the funds鈥 liquidity cap as disclosed in its offering documents, according to Brian Hirshberg, a partner at Mayer Brown.
鈥淭hese funds typically limit liquidity that [an investor] can reasonably expect, and that should be taken into consideration when making an investment decision,鈥 he said.
Even though there is a cap on the amount of redemptions, managing cash inflows and outflows still requires careful planning.
鈥淚t goes back to having a disciplined and responsible approach to liquidity management and matching the investment strategy to the liquidity of the vehicle,鈥 said PIMCO鈥檚 Mandinach, who stressed the importance of providing liquidity with assets such as public debt and asset-backed finance loans.
Redemptions are paid through inflows from loan repayments, buyers of the funds and revolving lines of credit, the terms of which are determined by the lender who provides the line to the fund.
鈥淥nly relying on inflows to meet redemptions is a real dangerous game,鈥 said Kevin Prunty, senior managing director at Longwater Capital Solutions. 鈥淵ou can鈥檛 predict your inflows, while you have predetermined outflows, which is why active portfolio and liquidity management are imperative for asset managers.鈥
Yet, many managers of semi-liquid private credit funds rely too much on new inflows and cash from their balance sheet to meet redemptions, according to a large fund manager.
The funds have not necessarily been cycle-tested.
鈥淒irect lenders are coming out of an incredibly benign environment, and most credit vehicles have only grown 鈥 they’ve not gone into a period of net redemptions,鈥 said PIMCO鈥檚 Mandinach. 鈥淎nd so, is the industry built for an extended period of net redemptions? My answer is no.鈥
Interval funds’ appeal
The vehicles are attractive because of their accessibility and diversification of underlying assets.
Large institutional investors such as pension funds and endowments are receiving fewer distributions from private credit funds, making it harder for them to commit additional money to the asset class.
This dynamic has given the retail investor constituency a new importance, as it represents a new, potentially large, capital base when commitments from institutional LPs are slowing down.
The generational transition of wealth is another factor, Longwater鈥檚 Prunty said. Baby boomers are passing on their wealth to a younger generation that has a longer time horizon for investment.
鈥淭here鈥檚 a place for private credit interval funds in a younger person鈥檚 retirement portfolio if structured the right way,鈥 he said. 鈥淭he returns are just better and less volatile than the public equivalents, and this is a growing asset class that investors want to be able to access.鈥
Another allure of these funds is their daily NAV. Also, because they are electronically ticketed, it鈥檚 easy for investors to buy a fund online without having to sign any documents.
鈥淭hat鈥檚 what has catapulted a lot of momentum in the space,鈥 said Kim Flynn, president of XA Investments. 鈥淭he interval fund has daily NAV and doesn鈥檛 require subscription documents. Plus, with a yield north of 10%, private credit interval funds are selling like hotcakes.鈥
Navigating the new terrain
What鈥檚 more, some regulation has been passed that may further fuel access to the asset class with broader marketing and the removal of a limitation on private assets in some investment vehicles, including interval funds.
In May, the SEC amended guidance that curtailed the amount of private credit positions in an interval fund at 15% of the portfolio. While that means individual investors can get greater exposure to private credit assets, managing fund-level liquidity may get even tougher.
鈥淭he change in the SEC鈥檚 guidance in relation to the 15% cap on fund assets in closed-end funds should also help provide many investors with more access to private credit,鈥 said Mayer Brown鈥檚 Hirshberg.
Still, while it鈥檚 easy to get caught up in the hype, it鈥檚 important to remember that the interval fund market is still in its infancy.
鈥淔ifty percent of funds in market today have a track record short of three years,鈥 noted Flynn.
鈥淭he original interval funds have 20-year track records, but those are considered 鈥榣egacy funds鈥 and are essentially hedge funds or senior loan funds before they got put into ETFs and mutual funds,鈥 she added. 鈥淭hey wouldn鈥檛 be structured in that wrapper today.鈥
Assets in semi-liquid credit funds, which includes interval funds, grew to $194bn through May 31 and are projected to reach as high as $230bn this year, per XA Investments. Of the 55 interval funds in registration now, 23 are private credit funds.
Despite offering a modicum of liquidity, private credit interval funds should be treated like illiquid investments, as they cannot be traded into or out of like other investment products available to retail investors.
鈥淭here鈥檚 a risk marrying an inherently illiquid asset class with a vehicle that has been expected to have some semblance or implied liquidity,鈥 noted Prunty. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 where the education piece comes in so that investors are clear these are long-term capital appreciation vehicles and not to be looked as something similar to ETFs or mutual funds.鈥
Krista Giovacco
krista.giovacco@levfininsights.com
+1 917 757 6399
Benny Taubman
benny.taubman@levfininsights.com
+1 407 913 2381

